About The Author

Kristofer is the React lead at Bekk, and has worked on numerous large projects for the last 6 years. He hosts a beer based programming meetup, tries to keep his … More about Kristofer ↬

Email Newsletter

Weekly tips on front-end & UX .
Trusted by 200,000+ folks.

Ever wondered how validation libraries work? This article will tell you how to build your very own validation library for React step by step. The next part will add some more advanced features, and the final part will focus on improving the developer experience.

I’ve always thought form validation libraries were pretty cool. I know, it’s a niche interest to have — but we use them so much! At least in my job — most of what I do is constructing more or less complex forms with validation rules that depend on earlier choices and paths. Understanding how a form validation library would work is paramount.

Last year, I wrote one such form validation library. I named it “ Calidation ”, and you can read the introductory blog post here . It’s a good library that offers a lot of flexibility and uses a slightly different approach than the other ones on the market. There are tons of other great libraries out there too, though — mine just worked well for our requirements.

Today, I’m going to show you how to write your very own validation library for React. We will go through the process step by step, and you’ll find CodeSandbox examples as we go along. By the end of this article, you will know how to write your own validation library, or at the very least have a deeper understanding of how other libraries implement “the magic of validation”.

More after jump! Continue reading below ↓

Step 1: Designing The API

The first step of creating any library is designing how it’s going to be used. It lays the foundation for a lot of the work to come, and in my opinion, it’s the single most important decision you’re going to make in your library.

It’s important to create an API that’s “easy to use”, and yet flexible enough to allow for future improvements and advanced use cases. We’ll try to hit both of these goals.

We’re going to create a custom hook that will accept a single configuration object. This will allow for future options to be passed without introducing breaking changes.

A Note On Hooks

Hooks is a pretty new way of writing React. If you’ve written React in the past, you might not recognize a few of these concepts. In that case, please have a look at the official documentation . It’s incredibly well written, and takes you through the basics you need to know.

We’re going to call our custom hook useValidation for now. Its usage might look something like this:

										const config = { fields: { username: { isRequired: { message: 'Please fill out a username' }, }, password: { isRequired: { message: 'Please fill out a password' }, isMinLength: { value: 6, message: 'Please make it more secure' } } }, onSubmit: e => { /* handle submit */ } }; const { getFieldProps, getFormProps, errors } = useValidation(config);

The config object accepts a fields prop, which sets up the validation rules for each field. In addition, it accepts a callback for when the form submits.

The fields object contains a key for each field we want to validate. Each field has its own config, where each key is a validator name, and each value is a configuration property for that validator. Another way of writing the same would be:

						{ fields: { fieldName: { oneValidator: { validatorRule: 'validator value' }, anotherValidator: { errorMessage: 'something is not as it should' } } } }

Our useValidation hook will return an object with a few properties — getFieldProps , getFormProps and errors . The two first functions are what Kent C. Dodds calls “prop getters” ( see here for a great article on those ), and is used to get the relevant props for a given form field or form tag. The errors prop is an object with any error messages, keyed per field.

This usage would look like this:

		const config = { ... }; // like above const LoginForm = props => { const { getFieldProps, getFormProps, errors } = useValidation(config); return (
); };

Alrighty! So we’ve nailed the API.

Note that we’ve created a mock implementation of the useValidation hook as well. For now, it’s just returning an object with the objects and functions we require to be there, so we don’t break our sample implementation.

Storing The Form State 💾

The first thing we need to do is storing all of the form state in our custom hook. We need to remember the values of each field, any error messages and whether or not the form has been submitted. We’ll use the useReducer hook for this since it allows for the most flexibility (and less boilerplate). If you’ve ever used Redux , you’ll see some familiar concepts — and if not, we’ll explain as we go along! We’ll start off by writing a reducer, which is passed to the useReducer hook:

		const initialState = { values: {}, errors: {}, submitted: false, }; function validationReducer(state, action) { switch(action.type) { case 'change': const values = { ...state.values, ...action.payload }; return { ...state, values, }; case 'submit': return { ...state, submitted: true }; default: throw new Error('Unknown action type'); } }

What’s A Reducer? 🤔

A reducer is a function that accepts an object of values and an “action” and returns an augmented version of the values object.

Actions are plain JavaScript objects with a type property. We’re using a switch statement to handle each possible action type.

The “object of values” is often referred to as state , and in our case, it’s the state of our validation logic.

Our state consists of three pieces of data — values (the current values of our form fields), errors (the current set of error messages) and a flag isSubmitted indicating whether or not our form has been submitted at least once.

In order to store our form state, we need to implement a few parts of our useValidation hook. When we call our getFieldProps method, we need to return an object with the value of that field, a change-handler for when it changes, and a name prop to track which field is which.

		function validationReducer(state, action) { // Like above } const initialState = { /* like above */ }; const useValidation = config => { const [state, dispatch] = useReducer(validationReducer, initialState); return { errors: state.errors, getFormProps: e => {}, getFieldProps: fieldName => ({ onChange: e => { if (!config.fields[fieldName]) { return; } dispatch({ type: 'change', payload: { [fieldName]: e.target.value } }); }, name: fieldName, value: state.values[fieldName], }), }; };

The getFieldProps method now returns the props required for each field. When a change event is fired, we ensure that field is in our validation configuration, and then tell our reducer a change action took place. The reducer will handle the changes to the validation state.

Validating Our Form 📄

Our form validation library is looking good, but isn’t doing much in terms of validating our form values! Let’s fix that. 💪

We’re going to validate all fields on every change event. This might not sound very efficient, but in the real world applications I’ve come across, it isn’t really an issue.

Note, we’re not saying you have to show every error on every change. We’ll revisit how to show errors only when you submit or navigates away from a field, later in this article.

How To Pick Validator Functions

When it comes to validators, there are tons of libraries out there that implement all the validation methods you’d ever need. You can also write your own if you want. It’s a fun exercise!

For this project, we’re going to use a set of validators I wrote some time ago — calidators . These validators have the following API:

	function isRequired(config) { return function(value) { if (value === '') { return config.message; } else { return null; } }; } // or the same, but terser const isRequired = config => value => value === '' ? config.message : null;

In other words, each validator accepts a configuration object and returns a fully-configured validator. When that function is called with a value, it returns the message prop if the value is invalid, or null if it’s valid. You can look at how some of these validators are implemented by looking at the source code .

To access these validators, install the calidators package with npm install calidators .

Validate a single field

Remember the config we pass to our useValidation object? It looks like this:

		{ fields: { username: { isRequired: { message: 'Please fill out a username' }, }, password: { isRequired: { message: 'Please fill out a password' }, isMinLength: { value: 6, message: 'Please make it more secure' } } }, // more stuff }

To simplify our implementation, let’s assume we only have a single field to validate. We’ll go through each key of the field’s configuration object, and run the validators one by one until we either find an error or are done validating.

		import * as validators from 'calidators'; function validateField(fieldValue = '', fieldConfig) { for (let validatorName in fieldConfig) { const validatorConfig = fieldConfig[validatorName]; const validator = validators[validatorName]; const configuredValidator = validator(validatorConfig); const errorMessage = configuredValidator(fieldValue); if (errorMessage) { return errorMessage; } } return null; }

Here, we’ve written a function validateField , which accepts the value to validate and the validator configs for that field. We loop through all of the validators, pass them the config for that validator, and run it. If we get an error message, we skip the rest of the validators and return. If not, we try the next validator.

Note: On validator APIs

If you choose different validators with different APIs (like the very popular validator.js ), this part of your code might look a bit different. For brevity’s sake, however, we let that part be an exercise left to the reader.

Note: On for…in loops

Never used for...in loops before? That’s fine, this was my first time too! Basically, it iterates over the keys in an object. You can read more about them at MDN .

Validate all the fields

Now that we’ve validated one field, we should be able to validate all fields without too much trouble.

		function validateField(fieldValue = '', fieldConfig) { // as before } function validateFields(fieldValues, fieldConfigs) { const errors = {}; for (let fieldName in fieldConfigs) { const fieldConfig = fieldConfigs[fieldName]; const fieldValue = fieldValues[fieldName]; errors[fieldName] = validateField(fieldValue, fieldConfig); } return errors; }

We’ve written a function validateFields that accepts all field values and the entire field config. We loop through each field name in the config and validate that field with its config object and value.

Next: Tell our reducer

Alrighty, so now we have this function that validates all of our stuff. Let’s pull it into the rest of our code!

First, we’re going to add a validate action handler to our validationReducer .

	function validationReducer(state, action) { switch (action.type) { case 'change': // as before case 'submit': // as before case 'validate': return { ...state, errors: action.payload }; default: throw new Error('Unknown action type'); } }

Whenever we trigger the validate action, we replace the errors in our state with whatever was passed alongside the action.

Next up, we’re going to trigger our validation logic from a useEffect hook:

		const useValidation = config => { const [state, dispatch] = useReducer(validationReducer, initialState); useEffect(() => { const errors = validateFields(state.fields, config.fields); dispatch({ type: 'validate', payload: errors }); }, [state.fields, config.fields]); return { // as before }; };

This useEffect hook runs whenever either our state.fields or config.fields changes, in addition to on first mount.

Beware Of Bug 🐛

There’s a super subtle bug in the code above. We’ve specified that our useEffect hook should only re-run whenever the state.fields or config.fields change. Turns out, “change” doesn’t necessarily mean a change in value! useEffect uses Object.is to ensure equality between objects, which in turn uses reference equality. That is — if you pass a new object with the same content, it won’t be the same (since the object itself is new).

The state.fields are returned from useReducer , which guarantees us this reference equality, but our config is specified inline in our function component. That means the object is re-created on every render, which in turn will trigger the useEffect above!

To solve this, we need to use for the use-deep-compare-effect library by Kent C. Dodds. You install it with npm install use-deep-compare-effect , and replace your useEffect call with this instead. This makes sure we do a deep equality check instead of a reference equality check.

Your code will now look like this:

		import useDeepCompareEffect from 'use-deep-compare-effect'; const useValidation = config => { const [state, dispatch] = useReducer(validationReducer, initialState); useDeepCompareEffect(() => { const errors = validateFields(state.fields, config.fields); dispatch({ type: 'validate', payload: errors }); }, [state.fields, config.fields]); return { // as before }; };

A Note On useEffect

Turns out, useEffect is a pretty interesting function. Dan Abramov wrote a really nice, long article on the intricacies of useEffect if you’re interested in learning all there is about this hook.

Now things are starting to look like a validation library!

Handling Form Submission

The final piece of our basic form validation library is handling what happens when we submit the form. Right now, it reloads the page, and nothing happens. That’s not optimal. We want to prevent the default browser behavior when it comes to forms, and handle it ourselves instead. We place this logic inside the getFormProps prop getter function:

		const useValidation = config => { const [state, dispatch] = useReducer(validationReducer, initialState); // as before return { getFormProps: () => ({ onSubmit: e => { e.preventDefault(); dispatch({ type: 'submit' }); if (config.onSubmit) { config.onSubmit(state); } }, }), // as before }; };

We change our getFormProps function to return an onSubmit function, that is triggered whenever the submit DOM event is triggered. We prevent the default browser behavior, dispatch an action to tell our reducer we submitted, and call the provided onSubmit callback with the entire state — if it’s provided.


We’re there! We’ve created a simple, usable and pretty cool validation library. There’s still tons of work to do before we can dominate the interwebs, though.

Smashing Editorial (dm, il)